TooLate.Com: The Lowdown on Late Internet Shipments
Internet sales soared during last winter's holiday season,
with many consumers lured by the ease and convenience of
gift-shopping from home or work.
And although many were satisfied with their online shopping
experiences, other consumers had their orders delivered far later
than they'd been promised, and never got notification so they
could cancel the order and buy from another company. Some got
repeated promises - empty, as it turned out - that their
shipments would arrive before the holidays.
These practices aren't just annoying: They're illegal. The
Federal Trade Commission recently took action against seven
e-tail violators in "Project TooLate.Com." As a result
of the initiative, the e-tailers agreed to pay more than $1.5
million in civil penalties or consumer redress and to abide by
the FTC's Mail or Telephone Order Merchandise Rule in all future
transactions.
The Rule requires all retailers, including e-tailers, to ship
an order within the time stated in their ads or on their website
when the order is placed. If a company doesn't promise an earlier
time, it must ship the order within 30 days after receiving it.
If the company is unexpectedly unable to ship as promised, it
is required to provide adequate notice to consumers. Notices must
be sent to the buyer promptly, with a revised shipping date. The
consumer must be allowed to agree to the delay or cancel the
order and receive a prompt refund.
The Project TooLate.com e-tailers didn't do this. The FTC
alleges that the e-tailers missed shipment deadlines for many
holiday customers, failed to notify consumers of delays, and
continued to promise timely deliveries even when huge backlogs of
orders made it unlikely that the current orders would ship on
time. In addition, some e-tailers cashed consumers' money orders
or checks shortly after the orders were placed; in many cases, it
was long before the shipments were made.
FTC attorney Heather Hippsley says these practices can erode
consumer confidence in the electronic marketplace.
"Consumers have quickly embraced e-commerce," she says,
"but unless e-tailers deliver the same level of service and
the same protections consumers receive when they shop offline,
that confidence is likely to be short-lived."
She says that's why it's critical that retailers who offer
their goods and services through the Internet meet their legal
obligations.
"The bottom line is that when a company tells you it will
ship your order in a specified time, it has to notify you
promptly and inform you of your cancellation rights if it can't
make good on its promise," Hippsley says. "And a
company can't tell you that it's going to ship within a certain
amount of time if it doesn't have a reasonable basis to believe
it can."
Hippsley acknowledges that many of the companies involved in
the FTC law enforcement action received many more orders than
they anticipated. While most had the inventory they needed to
fill the orders, problems with processing and fulfillment kept
them from getting the shipments out the door.
In an effort to "make good" with their angry
customers, some e-tailers offered discounts or gift certificates
redeemable for future purchases.
Hippsley says while these goodwill gestures were taken into
consideration in the amount of civil penalties sought, they don't
excuse violations of the law. "It's important to hold
e-tailers to the same standards as other retailers," she
says.
She encourages consumers who have had an unsatisfactory online
shopping experience to contact the retailer first to try to
resolve the problem. If that doesn't work, she recommends taking
future business elsewhere.
However, if the problem involves a legal violation, she
encourages consumers to contact the Federal Trade Commission on
its toll-free helpline at 1-877-FTC-HELP (TDD: 1-866-653-4261);
using the online complaint form at ftc.gov, or writing: FTC,
Consumer Response Center, Federal Trade Commission, 600
Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20580.